Justice has been served for a Georgia transwoman!
Thanks to the efforts of Lambda Legal, late Friday afternoon the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ruled in the Glenn v. Brumby et. alcase that the Georgia General Assembly discriminated against transwoman Vandy Beth Glenn. She was fired from her job in 2007 as a Legislative Editor after she told her supervisor that she planned to transition.
“…avoiding the anticipated negative reactions of others cannot serve as a sufficient basis for discrimination and does not constitute an important government interest.” wrote United States District Court Judge Richard Story.
Dru Levasseur, Transgender Rights Attorney at Lambda Legal, who represented Glenn in her legal fight along with Greg Nevins, Lambda Legal’s Supervising Senior Staff Attorney for their Atlanta Southern Regional office stated, “The evidence was clear – Vandy Beth was fired because her boss didn’t like who she is, and that kind of treatment is unfair and illegal.”
Glenn worked for two years in the General Assembly’s Office of Legislative Counsel as an editor and proofreader of bill language. She loved her job, but living as a male was increasingly painful and distressing for Glenn who has a longstanding female gender identity.
After Glenn’s health care providers diagnosed her with Gender Identity Disorder (GID) and agreed that gender transition was necessary for her health and well-being, Glenn informed her immediate supervisor, Beth Yinger, that she planned to proceed with her transition.
She showed Yinger photographs of herself in professional female attire and Yinger passed the information on to her boss, the General Assembly’s Legislative Counsel, Sewell Brumby.
After confirming that Glenn intended to transition, Brumby decided to fire Vandy Beth because he thought her transition “…was inappropriate, that it would be disruptive, that some people would view it as a moral issue, and that it would make Glenn’s coworkers uncomfortable.”
Lambda Legal filed a lawsuit in July 2008 claiming that Glenn’s termination violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection guarantee because it treated her differently due to her nonconformity with sex stereotypes and her medical condition.
After the State’s motion to dismiss failed, the two sides filed motions for summary judgment in September 2009. Using the high standard of scrutiny required for sex discrimination claims, the Court ruled that Georgia General Assembly officials violated the Constitution and discriminated against Glenn by terminating her for failing to conform to gender stereotypes. Using a lower standard of review, the Court rejected the second Equal Protection claim that Glenn was discriminated against on the basis of her medical condition.
The Court’s ruling relied in part on Lambda Legal’s prior work in Lopez v. River Oaks, a federal discrimination case on behalf of a transwoman in Texas who had a job offer rescindedbecause she is transgender.
The Court has set a hearing for July 13 to determine a remedy.
“This is a major victory for all transgender people across the country, and I hope that a federal discrimination law will follow in its wake,” said Vandy Beth Glenn.
Amen, Vandy Beth. Here’s hoping that the message increasingly gets sent to bigots and the Forces of Intolerance that discrimination against trans people will not only not be tolerated, but carries a financial cost as well.
For you legal eagles, here’s the ruling.